State v. Ralston

Arizona Supreme Court

State v. Ralston

54 Ariz. 30

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedJune 19, 1939

DocketCivil No. 4077

StatusPublished

This text of 54 Ariz. 30 (State v. Ralston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ralston, 54 Ariz. 30 (Ark. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

LOCKWOOD, J.

— It has been stipulated by the parties to this action that the questions of law arising on this appeal are the same as those involved in the case of State of Arizona, Guy M. Jackson, Secretary of Board of Directors of State Institutions, and Ana [31]*31Frohmiller, State Auditor, Appellants, v. C. A. Angle, Appellee, ante, p. 13, 91 Pac. (2d) 705, and that judgment shall be entered herein in accordance with the opinion and decision of the court in the case last cited.

The judgment of the superior court of Yavapai county is, therefore, affirmed.

ROSS, C. J., and McALISTER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LOCKWOOD, J.

— It has been stipulated by the parties to this action that the questions of law arising on this appeal are the same as those involved in the case of State of Arizona, Guy M. Jackson, Secretary of Board of Directors of State Institutions, and Ana [31]*31Frohmiller, State Auditor, Appellants, v. C. A. Angle, Appellee, ante, p. 13, 91 Pac. (2d) 705, and that judgment shall be entered herein in accordance with the opinion and decision of the court in the case last cited.

The judgment of the superior court of Yavapai county is, therefore, affirmed.

ROSS, C. J., and McALISTER, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 Ariz. 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ralston-ariz-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack