State v. Rainey

686 S.E.2d 903, 363 N.C. 661
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 5, 2009·No. 371P09·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

686 S.E.2d 903 (2009)

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Robert Paul RAINEY.

No. 371P09.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 5, 2009.

James N. Freeman, Elkin, for Robert Rainey.

Kevin L. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 680 S.E.2d 760.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant-Appellant on the 7th of September 2009 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2009."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of September 2009 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2009."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rainey, 686 S.E.2d 903, 363 N.C. 661 (N.C. 2009).

686 S.E.2d 903 (State v. Rainey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rivera
686 S.E.2d 903 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2009)