State v. Rainey

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rainey

866 S.W.2d 942, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 13, 1994 WL 851

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 4, 1994·No. Nos. 61499, 63596·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of trafficking drugs in the second degree § 195.223.3 RSMo Cum.Supp.1992. We find no error, and an opinion would have no prec-edential value. A statement setting forth our reasons for affirmance is being furnished to the parties. Defendant’s appeal from denial of his Rule 29.15 motion was abandoned. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of trafficking drugs in the second degree § 195.223.3 RSMo Cum.Supp.1992. We find no error, and an opinion would have no prec-edential value. A statement setting forth our reasons for affirmance is being furnished to the parties. Defendant’s appeal from denial of his Rule 29.15 motion was abandoned. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Rainey, 866 S.W.2d 942, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 13, 1994 WL 851 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

866 S.W.2d 942 (State v. Rainey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.