State v. Radey

555 N.E.2d 969, 52 Ohio St. 3d 87, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 261
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 27, 1990·No. No. 89-995·Published

Opinion

This cause came before the court upon the certification of the court of appeals that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Franklin County in State v. Wolfe (1987), 41 Ohio App. 3d 119, 534 N.E. 2d 920, upon the following question:

“* * *[W]hether the activities depicted in [the] material [in question] must fall within the definition of sexual conduct as set out in R.C. 2907.01[A] in order for the materials to be considered obscene under constitutional standards.”

We find that the judgments of the courts of appeals do not conflict on the certified question. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. State v. Parobek (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 61, 550 N.E. 2d 476, and cases cited therein.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Radey, 555 N.E.2d 969, 52 Ohio St. 3d 87, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 261 (Ohio 1990).

555 N.E.2d 969 (State v. Radey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Wolfe
534 N.E.2d 920 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1987)
State v. Parobek
550 N.E.2d 476 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1990)