State v. Radey

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Radey

555 N.E.2d 969, 52 Ohio St. 3d 87, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 261

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 27, 1990

DocketNo. 89-995

StatusPublished

This text of 555 N.E.2d 969 (State v. Radey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Radey, 555 N.E.2d 969, 52 Ohio St. 3d 87, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 261 (Ohio 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause came before the court upon the certification of the court of appeals that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Franklin County in State v. Wolfe (1987), 41 Ohio App. 3d 119, 534 N.E. 2d 920, upon the following question:

“* * *[W]hether the activities depicted in [the] material [in question] must fall within the definition of sexual conduct as set out in R.C. 2907.01[A] in order for the materials to be considered obscene under constitutional standards.”

We find that the judgments of the courts of appeals do not conflict on the certified question. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. State v. Parobek (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 61, 550 N.E. 2d 476, and cases cited therein.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause came before the court upon the certification of the court of appeals that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Franklin County in State v. Wolfe (1987), 41 Ohio App. 3d 119, 534 N.E. 2d 920, upon the following question:

“* * *[W]hether the activities depicted in [the] material [in question] must fall within the definition of sexual conduct as set out in R.C. 2907.01[A] in order for the materials to be considered obscene under constitutional standards.”

We find that the judgments of the courts of appeals do not conflict on the certified question. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. State v. Parobek (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 61, 550 N.E. 2d 476, and cases cited therein.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

555 N.E.2d 969, 52 Ohio St. 3d 87, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-radey-ohio-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack