State v. R. S.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. R. S.

290 P.3d 823, 253 Or. App. 249

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedOctober 24, 2012

DocketC110066MC; A149179

StatusPublished

This text of 290 P.3d 823 (State v. R. S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. R. S., 290 P.3d 823, 253 Or. App. 249 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that, due to a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself and unable to provide for his basic personal needs. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that, due to a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself and unable to provide for his basic personal needs. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 P.3d 823, 253 Or. App. 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-r-s-orctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack