State v. R. S.

290 P.3d 823, 253 Or. App. 249
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. R. S.. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 Or. App. 569
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 24, 2012·No. C110066MC; A149179·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that, due to a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself and unable to provide for his basic personal needs. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. R. S., 290 P.3d 823, 253 Or. App. 249 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

290 P.3d 823 (State v. R. S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130
§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005