State v. R. R. P.

383 P.3d 987, 282 Or. App. 190
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 9, 2016·No. 15CC07416; A161319·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing her to the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130(l)(a)(C). She contends that, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, the state failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that, because of a mental disorder, she is a danger to herself. The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the order should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the commitment order.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. R. R. P., 383 P.3d 987, 282 Or. App. 190 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).

383 P.3d 987 (State v. R. R. P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130