State v. R. R. P.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. R. R. P.

383 P.3d 987, 282 Or. App. 190

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedNovember 9, 2016

Docket15CC07416; A161319

StatusPublished

This text of 383 P.3d 987 (State v. R. R. P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. R. R. P., 383 P.3d 987, 282 Or. App. 190 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing her to the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130(l)(a)(C). She contends that, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, the state failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that, because of a mental disorder, she is a danger to herself. The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the order should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the commitment order.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing her to the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130(l)(a)(C). She contends that, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, the state failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that, because of a mental disorder, she is a danger to herself. The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the order should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the commitment order.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

383 P.3d 987, 282 Or. App. 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-r-r-p-orctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack