State v. R. J. H.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. R. J. H.

340 P.3d 142, 267 Or. App. 116, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1698

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedNovember 19, 2014

Docket13071753; A154873

StatusPublished

This text of 340 P.3d 142 (State v. R. J. H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. R. J. H., 340 P.3d 142, 267 Or. App. 116, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1698 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He contends that the trial court erred in concluding that, as a result of a mental disorder, he is a danger to others. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s order should be reversed. We agree, and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He contends that the trial court erred in concluding that, as a result of a mental disorder, he is a danger to others. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s order should be reversed. We agree, and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

340 P.3d 142, 267 Or. App. 116, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-r-j-h-orctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack