State v. R. J. H.

340 P.3d 142, 267 Or. App. 116, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1698
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 19, 2014·No. 13071753; A154873·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He contends that the trial court erred in concluding that, as a result of a mental disorder, he is a danger to others. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s order should be reversed. We agree, and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. R. J. H., 340 P.3d 142, 267 Or. App. 116, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1698 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).

340 P.3d 142 (State v. R. J. H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130
§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005