State v. R. G.

324 P.3d 483, 260 Or. App. 779
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 5, 2014
Docket12C19507; A152473
StatusPublished

This text of 324 P.3d 483 (State v. R. G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. R. G., 324 P.3d 483, 260 Or. App. 779 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She contends that the trial court erred in concluding that, as a result of a mental disorder, she is (1) a danger to herself and (2) unable to provide for her basic personal needs and is not receiving the care necessary for her health or safety. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s order should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130
§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
324 P.3d 483, 260 Or. App. 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-r-g-orctapp-2014.