State v. R. F.
280 P.3d 403, 250 Or. App. 386, 2012 WL 2029971, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 734
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that he is a danger to himself because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree; therefore, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. R. F., 280 P.3d 403, 250 Or. App. 386, 2012 WL 2029971, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 734 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
280 P.3d 403 (State v. R. F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.