State v. R. F.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. R. F.

280 P.3d 403, 250 Or. App. 386, 2012 WL 2029971, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 734

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJune 6, 2012

Docket110868160; A149421

StatusPublished

This text of 280 P.3d 403 (State v. R. F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. R. F., 280 P.3d 403, 250 Or. App. 386, 2012 WL 2029971, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 734 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that he is a danger to himself because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree; therefore, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that he is a danger to himself because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree; therefore, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 P.3d 403, 250 Or. App. 386, 2012 WL 2029971, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-r-f-orctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack