State v. R. C.

453 P.3d 635, 301 Or. App. 175
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 4, 2019·No. A171414·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Submitted November 1, reversed December 4, 2019

In the Matter of R. C., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. R. C., Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 19CC02963; A171414 453 P3d 635

Monica M. Herranz, Judge pro tempore. Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Patricia G. Rincon, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Chief Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. 176 State v. R. C.

PER CURIAM The trial court committed appellant to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days and entered an order prohibiting appellant from pur- chasing or possessing firearms after determining that she was a danger to others. ORS 426.005(1)(f)(A). Appellant con- tends that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion that she is a danger to others. The state concedes that the record is legally insufficient in that regard and that the judgment of commitment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the commitment judgment and the order prohibiting the purchase or possession of firearms. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. R. C., 453 P.3d 635, 301 Or. App. 175 (Or. Ct. App. 2019).

453 P.3d 635 (State v. R. C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ayala
453 P.3d 635 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2019)