State v. R. A.

302 P.3d 482, 256 Or. App. 852, 2013 WL 2389839, 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 647
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 30, 2013·No. 120768154; A152295·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to himself because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. R. A., 302 P.3d 482, 256 Or. App. 852, 2013 WL 2389839, 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 647 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).

302 P.3d 482 (State v. R. A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130
§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005