State v. R. A. C.
209 P.3d 426, 228 Or. App. 752, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 743
Opinion
In this civil commitment case, the trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and, because of that disorder, is a danger to herself. On appeal, appellant contends that the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support the order of involuntary commitment. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. Although we are not bound by the state’s concession, on de novo review, we conclude that the state’s concession is well founded and agree that the evidence is insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. R. A. C., 209 P.3d 426, 228 Or. App. 752, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 743 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
209 P.3d 426 (State v. R. A. C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Rac
209 P.3d 426 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)