State v. R. A. C.

209 P.3d 426, 228 Or. App. 752, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 743
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 27, 2009
Docket080262038; A138254
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 P.3d 426 (State v. R. A. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. R. A. C., 209 P.3d 426, 228 Or. App. 752, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 743 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this civil commitment case, the trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and, because of that disorder, is a danger to herself. On appeal, appellant contends that the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support the order of involuntary commitment. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. Although we are not bound by the state’s concession, on de novo review, we conclude that the state’s concession is well founded and agree that the evidence is insufficient.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Rac
209 P.3d 426 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 P.3d 426, 228 Or. App. 752, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-r-a-c-orctapp-2009.