State v. R. A. C.
This text of 209 P.3d 426 (State v. R. A. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this civil commitment case, the trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and, because of that disorder, is a danger to herself. On appeal, appellant contends that the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support the order of involuntary commitment. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. Although we are not bound by the state’s concession, on de novo review, we conclude that the state’s concession is well founded and agree that the evidence is insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 P.3d 426, 228 Or. App. 752, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-r-a-c-orctapp-2009.