State v. Quinones

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Quinones

383 A.2d 95, 75 N.J. 391, 1978 N.J. LEXIS 141

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 9, 1978·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.

Justices Clifford and Schreiber would modify the judgment below for the reasons set forth in their dissenting opinion in State v. Jenkins, 75 N. J. 392, decided this day, by vacating the additional sentence of five to seven years for being armed in the commission of manslaughter.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Sullivan, Pashman and Handler — 4.

For modification — Justices Clieeord and Schreiber — 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.

Justices Clifford and Schreiber would modify the judgment below for the reasons set forth in their dissenting opinion in State v. Jenkins, 75 N. J. 392, decided this day, by vacating the additional sentence of five to seven years for being armed in the commission of manslaughter.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Sullivan, Pashman and Handler — 4.

For modification — Justices Clieeord and Schreiber — 2.

State v. Quinones, 383 A.2d 95, 75 N.J. 391, 1978 N.J. LEXIS 141 (N.J. 1978).

Pincite

383 A.2d 95 (State v. Quinones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related