State v. Quinney

543 So. 2d 1050, 1989 WL 52198
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided April 21, 1989·No. K89-426·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

543 So.2d 1050 (1989)

STATE of Louisiana
v.
James QUINNEY.

No. K89-426.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

April 21, 1989.
Writ Denied May 30, 1989.

*1051 Charles A. Riddle, III, Marksville, for applicant.

J. Edward Knoll, Dist. Atty., Marksville, for respondent.

Before GUIDRY, STOKER and YELVERTON, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY: The trial court erred in refusing to quash and dismiss the prosecution due to the unreasonable delay between entry of a plea of guilty and sentence, i.e., thirteen (13) years. The delay, in and of itself, was unreasonable and the record does not reflect any factors which would justify such a delay. See, State v. Milson, 458 So.2d 1037 (La.App. 3 Cir.1984). The ruling of the trial court is reversed and it is divested of jurisdiction to sentence relator for the offense. La.C.Cr.P. art. 874; State v. McQueen, 308 So.2d 752 (La.1975).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Quinney, 543 So. 2d 1050, 1989 WL 52198 (La. Ct. App. 1989).

543 So. 2d 1050 (State v. Quinney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bass
767 So. 2d 772 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2000)
State v. Hancock
748 So. 2d 549 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1999)
State v. Dorsey
672 So. 2d 188 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
State v. McCoy
586 So. 2d 697 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)
Spataro v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR.
577 So. 2d 795 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)