State v. Quarles

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Quarles

310 S.W.3d 317, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 705, 2010 WL 2034796

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 25, 2010·No. WD 70334·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lamar Quarles appeals his convictions after a jury trial of first-degree murder, first-degree robbery, and two counts of armed criminal action. Quarles contends that his convictions for first-degree murder and the associated armed criminal action count must be reversed, because there was insufficient evidence from which the jury could find that he deliberated before killing his victim. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lamar Quarles appeals his convictions after a jury trial of first-degree murder, first-degree robbery, and two counts of armed criminal action. Quarles contends that his convictions for first-degree murder and the associated armed criminal action count must be reversed, because there was insufficient evidence from which the jury could find that he deliberated before killing his victim. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Quarles, 310 S.W.3d 317, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 705, 2010 WL 2034796 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

310 S.W.3d 317 (State v. Quarles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.