Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Quandt

State v. Quandt

785 N.E.2d 471, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1488
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 19, 2003
Docket2002-1993
StatusPublished

This text of 785 N.E.2d 471 (State v. Quandt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Quandt, 785 N.E.2d 471, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1488 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 80222, 2002-Ohio-4903. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. II.

Moyer, C. J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., concur but would allow all propositions of law. F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary cross-appeal denied.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
785 N.E.2d 471, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-quandt-ohio-2003.