State v. Qualls
2011 Ohio 1049, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1424
This text of 2011 Ohio 1049 (State v. Qualls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Qualls, 2011 Ohio 1049, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1424 (Ohio 2011).
Opinion
Meigs App. No. 10CA8, 2010-Ohio-5316. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties shall brief the issue stated at page 6 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed January 13, 2011:
“If a defendant is notified about postrelease control at the sentencing hearing, but that notification is inadvertently omitted from the sentencing entry, can that omission be corrected with a nunc pro tunc entry?”
The conflict case is State v. Lee, Lucas App. No. L-09-1279, 2010-Ohio-1704.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Qualls
2010 Ohio 5316 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2011 Ohio 1049, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-qualls-ohio-2011.