State v. Puryear
230 S.E.2d 678, 291 N.C. 325, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 991
This text of 230 S.E.2d 678 (State v. Puryear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Puryear, 230 S.E.2d 678, 291 N.C. 325, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 991 (N.C. 1976).
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Earl V. PURYEAR.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Ragsdale, Liggett & Cheshire, for defendant.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Thomas B. Wood, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State.
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 30 N.C.App. 719, 228 S.E.2d 536. Denied. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Louchheim
244 S.E.2d 195 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
State v. Smith
239 S.E.2d 610 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
230 S.E.2d 678, 291 N.C. 325, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-puryear-nc-1976.