State v. Puryear
230 S.E.2d 678, 291 N.C. 325, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 991
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Earl V. PURYEAR.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Ragsdale, Liggett & Cheshire, for defendant.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Thomas B. Wood, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State.
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 30 N.C.App. 719, 228 S.E.2d 536. Denied. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Puryear, 230 S.E.2d 678, 291 N.C. 325, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 991 (N.C. 1976).
230 S.E.2d 678 (State v. Puryear) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Louchheim
244 S.E.2d 195 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
State v. Smith
239 S.E.2d 610 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)