State v. Puls

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Puls

42 S.W. 1149, 141 Mo. 326, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 314

DecidedNovember 9, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 42 S.W. 1149 (State v. Puls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Puls, 42 S.W. 1149, 141 Mo. 326, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 314 (Mo. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Burgess, J.

— On the sixth day of November, 1896, the defendant was convicted in the criminal court of the city of St. Louis of an assault upon one John Ostermeyer with intent to do great bodily harm and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and three months’ imprisonment in the city jail. The case is before us for review upon his appeal.

An examination of the record has satisfied us that it is free from prejudicial error. We therefore affirm the judgment.

Gantt, P. J., and Sherwood, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgess, J.

— On the sixth day of November, 1896, the defendant was convicted in the criminal court of the city of St. Louis of an assault upon one John Ostermeyer with intent to do great bodily harm and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and three months’ imprisonment in the city jail. The case is before us for review upon his appeal.

An examination of the record has satisfied us that it is free from prejudicial error. We therefore affirm the judgment.

Gantt, P. J., and Sherwood, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 S.W. 1149, 141 Mo. 326, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-puls-mo-1897.