State v. Puls

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Puls

42 S.W. 1149, 141 Mo. 326, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 314

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided November 9, 1897·Published

Opinion

Burgess, J.

— On the sixth day of November, 1896, the defendant was convicted in the criminal court of the city of St. Louis of an assault upon one John Ostermeyer with intent to do great bodily harm and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and three months’ imprisonment in the city jail. The case is before us for review upon his appeal.

An examination of the record has satisfied us that it is free from prejudicial error. We therefore affirm the judgment.

Gantt, P. J., and Sherwood, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgess, J.

— On the sixth day of November, 1896, the defendant was convicted in the criminal court of the city of St. Louis of an assault upon one John Ostermeyer with intent to do great bodily harm and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and three months’ imprisonment in the city jail. The case is before us for review upon his appeal.

An examination of the record has satisfied us that it is free from prejudicial error. We therefore affirm the judgment.

Gantt, P. J., and Sherwood, J., concur.

State v. Puls, 42 S.W. 1149, 141 Mo. 326, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 314 (Mo. 1897).

Pincite

42 S.W. 1149 (State v. Puls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.