State v. . Pugh

147 S.E. 7, 196 N.C. 725, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 88
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 13, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The bill of indictment charges the defendant and another with the larceny of “334 pounds of leaf tobacco, of the value of $58.97, the goods and chattels of L. B. Jenkins Company,” and with receiving same knowing it to have been feloniously stolen or taken in violation of C. S., 4250. There is no evidence on the record tending to show that the tobacco, if stolen or received with knowledge of its larceny by another, was the property of L. B. Jenkins Company. S. v. Hadfock, 3 N. C., 162. Proof of the corpus delicti, therefore, is wanting, or the crime as charged is not supported by the evidence. Hence, the defendant’s motion to dismiss or for judgment as in case of nonsuit should have been allowed. Allegation without proof is unavailing. S. v. Corpening, 191 N. C., 751, 133 S. E., 14.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Pugh, 147 S.E. 7, 196 N.C. 725, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 88 (N.C. 1929).

147 S.E. 7 (State v. . Pugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brady
75 S.E.2d 791 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)