State v. . Pugh

147 S.E. 7, 196 N.C. 725, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 88
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 13, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 147 S.E. 7 (State v. . Pugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Pugh, 147 S.E. 7, 196 N.C. 725, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 88 (N.C. 1929).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The bill of indictment charges the defendant and another with the larceny of “334 pounds of leaf tobacco, of the value of $58.97, the goods and chattels of L. B. Jenkins Company,” and with receiving same knowing it to have been feloniously stolen or taken in violation of C. S., 4250. There is no evidence on the record tending to show that the tobacco, if stolen or received with knowledge of its larceny by another, was the property of L. B. Jenkins Company. S. v. Hadfock, 3 N. C., 162. Proof of the corpus delicti, therefore, is wanting, or the crime as charged is not supported by the evidence. Hence, the defendant’s motion to dismiss or for judgment as in case of nonsuit should have been allowed. Allegation without proof is unavailing. S. v. Corpening, 191 N. C., 751, 133 S. E., 14.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Brady
75 S.E.2d 791 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 S.E. 7, 196 N.C. 725, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pugh-nc-1929.