State v. Pugh.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Pugh.

42 S.E. 936, 131 N.C. 807, 1902 N.C. LEXIS 362

DecidedDecember 16, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 42 S.E. 936 (State v. Pugh.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Pugh., 42 S.E. 936, 131 N.C. 807, 1902 N.C. LEXIS 362 (N.C. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Clark, J.

The defendant was convicted of the larceny of a suit of clothes, and sentenced to ten years in the State’s Prison. The only evidence was that a sailor accused the defendant of having stolen his suit of clothes out of a bag which the defendant was carrying for him, and the defendant denied the' charge when made. The Judge should have charged the jury, as requested, that there was no evidence. The sailor was not at the trial, nor was there any witness who testified to any circumstances bearing upon the alleged commission of the offense. The remark of the sailor was hearsay, and was only competent ,as a quasi admission if the defendant had failed to deny the charge. This the defendant did promptly when so charged, and also went upon the stand and denied it at the trial. There was not the scintilla of any evidence against him.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark, J.

The defendant was convicted of the larceny of a suit of clothes, and sentenced to ten years in the State’s Prison. The only evidence was that a sailor accused the defendant of having stolen his suit of clothes out of a bag which the defendant was carrying for him, and the defendant denied the' charge when made. The Judge should have charged the jury, as requested, that there was no evidence. The sailor was not at the trial, nor was there any witness who testified to any circumstances bearing upon the alleged commission of the offense. The remark of the sailor was hearsay, and was only competent ,as a quasi admission if the defendant had failed to deny the charge. This the defendant did promptly when so charged, and also went upon the stand and denied it at the trial. There was not the scintilla of any evidence against him.

Error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 S.E. 936, 131 N.C. 807, 1902 N.C. LEXIS 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pugh-nc-1902.