State v. Pugh

374 So. 2d 654, 1979 La. LEXIS 8175
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Pugh. Read the opinion of the Court — 369 So. 2d 1308
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided August 31, 1979·No. No. 65509·Published

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana, through the District Attorney, J. Carl Parkerson, applying for writs of certiorari and review, and a stay order. Ouachita Parish. Nos. 38918 and 38919.

Writ granted. As phrased, the only relevancy of the question is whether the named individual had any connection with the investigation. At the Motion to Suppress hearing, it’s apparent relevancy is only to discover whether the individual was the confidential informant. Without further foundation of other relevancy, the state’s objection to the question shall be sustained. Remanded to District Court.

DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ., would grant the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pugh, 374 So. 2d 654, 1979 La. LEXIS 8175 (La. 1979).

374 So. 2d 654 (State v. Pugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.