State v. Puckett

170 A.2d 437, 34 N.J. 574, 1961 N.J. LEXIS 236
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 8, 1961·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

The opinion was delivered

Pee Oueiam.

The defendant appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division affirming his conviction of unlawful possession of narcotics in violation of R. 8. 24:18-4. As to the issues raised before the Appellate Division, we agree with its determination for the reasons expressed in its opinion reported in 67 N. J. Super. 365 (1960). The additional arguments advanced by the defendant on this appeal were considered and rejected by this court today in State v. Reed, 34 N. J. 554 (1961). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall and Schettino—6.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Puckett, 170 A.2d 437, 34 N.J. 574, 1961 N.J. LEXIS 236 (N.J. 1961).

170 A.2d 437 (State v. Puckett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
State v. Latimore
484 A.2d 702 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)
State v. Brown
404 A.2d 1111 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1979)
State v. Sapp
366 A.2d 335 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
State v. Rajnai
334 A.2d 364 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
State v. Koch
214 N.W.2d 202 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1974)
State v. Bailey
235 A.2d 214 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Miller v. Muscarelle
170 A.2d 437 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)