State v. P.T.D. (In re Interest of P.T.D.)

921 N.W.2d 176
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 2019·No. No. 20180192; No. 20180193; No. 20180194; No. 20180195; No. 20180196·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶1] A.D. appeals from a juvenile court order finding her five children to be deprived. On appeal, A.D. argues the juvenile court erred by finding the children to be deprived because the unsanitary and dangerous household has been cured by a move to a new home, any drug issues are now under control, there was no evidence she used drugs around the children, and the record does not contain any evidence her actions have negatively affected the children. We conclude the juvenile court's findings are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. P.T.D. (In re Interest of P.T.D.), 921 N.W.2d 176 (N.D. 2019).

921 N.W.2d 176 (State v. P.T.D. (In re Interest of P.T.D.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.