State v. P.T.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. P.T.

625 So. 2d 144, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10920, 1993 WL 432001

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 1993·No. No. 93-291·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the state’s motion to treat its appeal as an application for certiorari to review an order suppressing the juvenile respondent’s confession and deny certiorari on the authority of Thompson v. State, 548 So.2d 198, 203 (Fla.1989) (“The fact of mental subnormality or impairment alone does not render a confession involuntary, Boss v. State, 386 So.2d 1191 (Fla.1980), except in those rare cases involving subnormality or impairment so severe as to render the defendant unable to communicate intelligibly or understand the meaning of Miranda warnings even when presented in simplified form. Cooper v. Griffin, 455 F.2d 1142 (5th Cir. 1972).” [e.s.]).

Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant the state’s motion to treat its appeal as an application for certiorari to review an order suppressing the juvenile respondent’s confession and deny certiorari on the authority of Thompson v. State, 548 So.2d 198, 203 (Fla.1989) (“The fact of mental subnormality or impairment alone does not render a confession involuntary, Boss v. State, 386 So.2d 1191 (Fla.1980), except in those rare cases involving subnormality or impairment so severe as to render the defendant unable to communicate intelligibly or understand the meaning of Miranda warnings even when presented in simplified form. Cooper v. Griffin, 455 F.2d 1142 (5th Cir. 1972).” [e.s.]).

Certiorari denied.

State v. P.T., 625 So. 2d 144, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10920, 1993 WL 432001 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

625 So. 2d 144 (State v. P.T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related