State v. Pryor
166 A. 796, 35 Del. 436, 5 W.W. Harr. 436, 1932 Del. LEXIS 33
CourtNew York Court of General Session of the Peace
DecidedNovember 22, 1932
DocketNo. 15
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases
This text of 166 A. 796 (State v. Pryor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of General Session of the Peace primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Pryor, 166 A. 796, 35 Del. 436, 5 W.W. Harr. 436, 1932 Del. LEXIS 33 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1932).
Opinion
in overruling the objection, said:
Pryor, though a joint defendant, gave testimony tending to show that Smith was the sole guilty party. Counsel for Smith, therefore, has the right to cross-examine Pryor like he would any other adverse witness in the case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Chavin v. Cope
243 A.2d 694 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1968)
BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION IN WILMINGTON v. Rimlinger
232 A.2d 98 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1967)
Barks v. Herzberg
206 A.2d 507 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1965)
Carter Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
201 F.2d 446 (Ninth Circuit, 1953)
State v. Carter
46 So. 2d 897 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1950)
Moore v. Belt
212 P.2d 509 (California Supreme Court, 1949)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
166 A. 796, 35 Del. 436, 5 W.W. Harr. 436, 1932 Del. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pryor-nygensess-1932.