State v. Pryor
This text of 205 N.W.2d 676 (State v. Pryor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant, convicted by a jury of simple robbery, Minn. St. 609.24, appeals from the judgment of conviction. We have carefully considered both of defendant’s contentions and find that neither has any merit. There clearly was sufficient evidence on the issue of identification, and the evidence justified the jury in rejecting the defense of voluntary intoxication under Minn. St. 609.075.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
205 N.W.2d 676, 296 Minn. 483, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pryor-minn-1973.