State v. Pryor

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Pryor

205 N.W.2d 676, 296 Minn. 483, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1232

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 6, 1973·No. No. 43391·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant, convicted by a jury of simple robbery, Minn. St. 609.24, appeals from the judgment of conviction. We have carefully considered both of defendant’s contentions and find that neither has any merit. There clearly was sufficient evidence on the issue of identification, and the evidence justified the jury in rejecting the defense of voluntary intoxication under Minn. St. 609.075.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant, convicted by a jury of simple robbery, Minn. St. 609.24, appeals from the judgment of conviction. We have carefully considered both of defendant’s contentions and find that neither has any merit. There clearly was sufficient evidence on the issue of identification, and the evidence justified the jury in rejecting the defense of voluntary intoxication under Minn. St. 609.075.

Affirmed.

State v. Pryor, 205 N.W.2d 676, 296 Minn. 483, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1232 (Mich. 1973).

Pincite

205 N.W.2d 676 (State v. Pryor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.