State v. Prutting

674 A.2d 1328, 236 Conn. 922, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 144
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 11, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 674 A.2d 1328 (State v. Prutting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Prutting, 674 A.2d 1328, 236 Conn. 922, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 144 (Colo. 1996).

Opinion

BERDON, J.,

dissenting. I would grant the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal.

[923]*923Decided March 11, 1996 Susann E. Gill, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
674 A.2d 1328, 236 Conn. 922, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-prutting-conn-1996.