State v. Prusinsky

543 So. 2d 411, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1214, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2679, 1989 WL 50274
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 17, 1989·No. No. 88-3065·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress contraband found in defendant’s automobile because its discovery occurred during the course of a valid inventory search after the automobile was taken into police custody. See South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364, 96 S.Ct. 3092, 49 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1976); Miller v. State, 403 So.2d 1307 (Fla.1981).

REVERSED.

DELL, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Prusinsky, 543 So. 2d 411, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1214, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2679, 1989 WL 50274 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

543 So. 2d 411 (State v. Prusinsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abbott v. State
543 So. 2d 411 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)