State v. Prusinsky

543 So. 2d 411, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1214, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2679, 1989 WL 50274
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 17, 1989
DocketNo. 88-3065
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 543 So. 2d 411 (State v. Prusinsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Prusinsky, 543 So. 2d 411, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1214, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2679, 1989 WL 50274 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress contraband found in defendant’s automobile because its discovery occurred during the course of a valid inventory search after the automobile was taken into police custody. See South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364, 96 S.Ct. 3092, 49 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1976); Miller v. State, 403 So.2d 1307 (Fla.1981).

REVERSED.

DELL, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abbott v. State
543 So. 2d 411 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 So. 2d 411, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1214, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2679, 1989 WL 50274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-prusinsky-fladistctapp-1989.