State v. Pruneau
837 S.W.2d 372, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1525, 1992 WL 236971
Opinion
In this bench-tried case, the trial court found defendant guilty of first degree sexual assault in violation of § 566.040, RSMo. He appeals his conviction as well as the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Pruneau, 837 S.W.2d 372, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1525, 1992 WL 236971 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).
837 S.W.2d 372 (State v. Pruneau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.