State v. Pruitt
823 P.2d 1039, 111 Or. App. 380, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 377
Opinion
Respondent has moved for summary affirmance on the ground that the issue that defendant seeks to raise is not within this court’s scope of review. We grant the motion. State v. Cook, 108 Or App 576, 816 P2d 697 (1991), rev den 312 Or 588 (1992).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Pruitt, 823 P.2d 1039, 111 Or. App. 380, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 377 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).
823 P.2d 1039 (State v. Pruitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Cook
816 P.2d 697 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)