State v. Pruitt

823 P.2d 1039, 111 Or. App. 380, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 377
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 12, 1992
Docket90-08-1776; CA A67842
StatusPublished

This text of 823 P.2d 1039 (State v. Pruitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Pruitt, 823 P.2d 1039, 111 Or. App. 380, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 377 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Respondent has moved for summary affirmance on the ground that the issue that defendant seeks to raise is not within this court’s scope of review. We grant the motion. State v. Cook, 108 Or App 576, 816 P2d 697 (1991), rev den 312 Or 588 (1992).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cook
816 P.2d 697 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
823 P.2d 1039, 111 Or. App. 380, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pruitt-orctapp-1992.