State v. Pruitt

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Pruitt

895 S.W.2d 263, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 459, 1995 WL 106539

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 14, 1995·No. Nos. 63727, 66447·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment entered on his conviction by a jury of delivery of a controlled substance. The trial court sentenced defendant as a prior offender to ten years imprisonment. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment entered on his conviction by a jury of delivery of a controlled substance. The trial court sentenced defendant as a prior offender to ten years imprisonment. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b)

State v. Pruitt, 895 S.W.2d 263, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 459, 1995 WL 106539 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

895 S.W.2d 263 (State v. Pruitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.