State v. Pruitt

415 S.E.2d 497, 202 Ga. App. 698, 35 Fulton County D. Rep. 23, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 121
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 5, 1992·No. A91A2044·Published

Opinion

Carley, Presiding Judge.

By way of accusation, appellee was charged with obstruction of a law enforcement officer. Thereafter, the trial court conducted a hearing and ordered the dismissal of the accusation for lack of “any probable cause to charge [appellee] with obstruction” of a law enforcement officer. Pursuant to OCGA § 5-7-1 (1), the State appeals from that order.

It does not appear from the record whether a post-arrest preaccusation probable cause hearing was held pursuant to Uniform State Court Rule 26. In any event, however, it is clear that the trial court had no jurisdiction to dismiss the accusation based upon the purported lack of probable cause. First Nat. Bank &c., Macon v. State, 237 Ga. 112 (227 SE2d 20) (1976). Accordingly, the erroneous dismissal of the accusation must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Beasley, J., and Judge Arnold Shulman concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pruitt, 415 S.E.2d 497, 202 Ga. App. 698, 35 Fulton County D. Rep. 23, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 121 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992).

415 S.E.2d 497 (State v. Pruitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First National Bank & Trust Co. v. State
227 S.E.2d 20 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)