State v. Prude

76 Miss. 543
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 76 Miss. 543 (State v. Prude) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Prude, 76 Miss. 543 (Mich. 1898).

Opinion

Terral, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellee was indicted for that she “did feloniously kill and sky an unborn quick child of said Emma Prude,” etc. The defendant demurred to the indictment. The court sustained the demurrer and the state appeals.

This is not a good indictment at common law, for by the common law, “An infant in the mother’s womb, not being in rerum natura, is not considered as a person who can be killed within the description of murder, and, therefore, if a woman, being quick or great with child, take any potion to cause an abortion, or if another give her any such potion, or if a person strike her, whereby the child within her is killed, it is not [545]*545murder or manslaughter. ’ ’ 3 Russell on Crimes (International ed.), 6; Wharton on Horn. (2d ed.), sec. 303; Wharton’s Am. Grim. Law (6th ed.), sec. 942; McClain on Crim. Law, sec. 294; Abams v. Foshee, 66 Am. Dec., 91, note.

The indictment, obviously, is not drawn under § 1157, code 1892, because the administration of some medicine, drug or substance, or the use of some instrument, with intent to destroy the unborn quick child, is not alleged therein, and because the taking of any substance or the use of any instrument by the pregnant woman herself with intent to destroy the child in her womb is not covered by said section. Bishop on Stat. Cr. (2d ed.), secs. 747, 749.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pro-Choice Mississippi v. Fordice
716 So. 2d 645 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1998)
Pro-Choice Mississippi v. Kirk Fordice
Mississippi Supreme Court, 1995
Spears v. Ellis
386 F. Supp. 653 (S.D. Mississippi, 1974)
State v. Peek
48 So. 819 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Miss. 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-prude-miss-1898.