State v. Provost
722 A.2d 808, 247 Conn. 914, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 382
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 29, 1998
DocketSC 16012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 722 A.2d 808 (State v. Provost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Provost, 722 A.2d 808, 247 Conn. 914, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 382 (Colo. 1998).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 56 (AC 15651) is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the trial court improperly preclude the cross-examination of a prosecution witness?
“2. Was the state’s attorney’s closing argument improper and is it reviewable under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989)?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Provost
741 A.2d 295 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
722 A.2d 808, 247 Conn. 914, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-provost-conn-1998.