State v. Provost
722 A.2d 808, 247 Conn. 914, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 382
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 56 (AC 15651) is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the trial court improperly preclude the cross-examination of a prosecution witness?
“2. Was the state’s attorney’s closing argument improper and is it reviewable under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989)?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Provost, 722 A.2d 808, 247 Conn. 914, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 382 (Colo. 1998).
722 A.2d 808 (State v. Provost) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Provost
741 A.2d 295 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)