State v. Provencher

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Provencher

536 A.2d 1123, 1988 Me. LEXIS 30

DecidedFebruary 4, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 536 A.2d 1123 (State v. Provencher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Provencher, 536 A.2d 1123, 1988 Me. LEXIS 30 (Me. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

By his appeal from his conviction in the Superior Court (York County) of trafficking in cocaine, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103, the [1124]*1124Defendant, Richard Provencher, asserts for the first time that the court erred in its instructions on entrapment and in not ordering a pre-sentence investigation and report as a prerequisite to his sentencing.

Our review of the record discloses the instruction was proper, State v. Turner, 495 A.2d 1211, 1213 (Me.1985), and the court did not err in determining not to order a pre-sentence investigation and report. M.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(1).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI