State v. Provencher

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Provencher

536 A.2d 1123, 1988 Me. LEXIS 30

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided February 4, 1988·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

By his appeal from his conviction in the Superior Court (York County) of trafficking in cocaine, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103, the [1124] Defendant, Richard Provencher, asserts for the first time that the court erred in its instructions on entrapment and in not ordering a pre-sentence investigation and report as a prerequisite to his sentencing.

Our review of the record discloses the instruction was proper, State v. Turner, 495 A.2d 1211, 1213 (Me.1985), and the court did not err in determining not to order a pre-sentence investigation and report. M.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(1).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

By his appeal from his conviction in the Superior Court (York County) of trafficking in cocaine, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103, the [1124] Defendant, Richard Provencher, asserts for the first time that the court erred in its instructions on entrapment and in not ordering a pre-sentence investigation and report as a prerequisite to his sentencing.

Our review of the record discloses the instruction was proper, State v. Turner, 495 A.2d 1211, 1213 (Me.1985), and the court did not err in determining not to order a pre-sentence investigation and report. M.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(1).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

State v. Provencher, 536 A.2d 1123, 1988 Me. LEXIS 30 (Me. 1988).

Pincite

536 A.2d 1123 (State v. Provencher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related