State v. Proietti
Opinion
This matter having come before the Court on a petition for certification from the judgment of the Appellate Division, and it appearing that both parties agree that the Appellate Division erred in directing the resentence of defendant to a higher degree of burglary than that to which he pled;
It is ORDERED that certification is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily reversed insofar as it directs the resentence of defendant to a higher degree of burglary than that to which he pled. The judgment of the [635] Appellate Division is otherwise summarily affirmed. On the remand to correct the Graves Act sentence on the theft offense, should the State seek to have defendant resentenced as a repeat Graves Act offender, it shall be bound by the terms of the plea agreement in respect of defendant’s maximum exposure under Count I of Indictment S-718-86.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
546 A.2d 548 (State v. Proietti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.