State v. Proctor

3 A.2d 109, 90 N.H. 553, 1938 N.H. LEXIS 84
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Proctor. Read the opinion of the Court — 91 N.H. 347
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 6, 1938·No. No. 3026.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The case is governed by Hazen v. Corporation, 89 N. H., 522. In the case at bar as in the case cited the challenges are not for principal cause but are to the favor (State v. Howard, 17 N. H. 171, 190 et seq.), and as such present no question of law for this court, but one of fact for the court below as to whether or not, in any particular instance, a juror objected to is indifferent.

Case discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Proctor, 3 A.2d 109, 90 N.H. 553, 1938 N.H. LEXIS 84 (N.H. 1938).

3 A.2d 109 (State v. Proctor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hazen v. P. H. Rice Corp.
2 A.2d 449 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1938)