State v. Proctor

192 S.E.2d 653, 16 N.C. App. 650, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1797
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided November 22, 1972·No. No. 727SC814·Published

Opinion

VAUGHN, Judge.

No exceptions were entered at the trial before Judge Martin. Several days after the entry of judgment, defendant expressed a desire to appeal. Counsel for defendant, with appropriate candor, concedes that he is unable to discover or assign error but states that defendant now contends that the plea was not voluntarily and understandingly entered. The record contains the transcript of defendant’s plea and the court’s adjudication thereon. It clearly and affirmatively appears that the plea was voluntarily and understandingly entered. The court’s adjudication thereon is supported by the evidence developed in open court and is affirmed. State v. Ford, 281 N.C. 62, 187 S.E. 2d 741.

No error.

Judges Hedrick and Graham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Proctor, 192 S.E.2d 653, 16 N.C. App. 650, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1797 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

192 S.E.2d 653 (State v. Proctor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ford
187 S.E.2d 741 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1972)