State v. Pritchard

180 S.E.2d 370, 11 N.C. App. 166, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1474
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedApril 28, 1971
DocketNo. 7125SC297
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 S.E.2d 370 (State v. Pritchard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Pritchard, 180 S.E.2d 370, 11 N.C. App. 166, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1474 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

BROCK, Judge.

Defendants assign as error that the trial judge refused to submit to' the jury the issue of self-defense.

There is no evidence in this record upon which to base a reasonable inference that defendants cut, or assaulted, the victim in self-defense. The State’s evidence discloses a senseless and unprovoked cutting of the victim. The defendants’ evidence discloses a ■ senseless and unprovoked assault upon them by the victim. Nowhere did their evidence indicate that they cut or assisted in cutting the victim in self-defense; all of their evidence tends to show that the victim was not cut.

The trial judge was correct in refusing to submit the issue of self-defense.

No error.

Judges Morris and Hedrick concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wells
298 S.E.2d 73 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 S.E.2d 370, 11 N.C. App. 166, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pritchard-ncctapp-1971.