State v. Pritchard
This text of 180 S.E.2d 370 (State v. Pritchard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendants assign as error that the trial judge refused to submit to' the jury the issue of self-defense.
There is no evidence in this record upon which to base a reasonable inference that defendants cut, or assaulted, the victim in self-defense. The State’s evidence discloses a senseless and unprovoked cutting of the victim. The defendants’ evidence discloses a ■ senseless and unprovoked assault upon them by the victim. Nowhere did their evidence indicate that they cut or assisted in cutting the victim in self-defense; all of their evidence tends to show that the victim was not cut.
The trial judge was correct in refusing to submit the issue of self-defense.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 S.E.2d 370, 11 N.C. App. 166, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pritchard-ncctapp-1971.