State v. Pringle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Pringle

474 So. 2d 16, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1992, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15237

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 20, 1985

DocketNo. 84-1387

StatusPublished

This text of 474 So. 2d 16 (State v. Pringle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Pringle, 474 So. 2d 16, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1992, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15237 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida appeals from a final order adjudicating the defendant incompetent to stand trial. The state argues that the trial court should have held an incompetency hearing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.212, even though the defendant was adjudicated incompetent approximately three weeks previously in an unrelated case. We affirm the order of the trial court without prejudice to the state’s filing a new motion to adjudicate defendant’s competency to stand trial at this time.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida appeals from a final order adjudicating the defendant incompetent to stand trial. The state argues that the trial court should have held an incompetency hearing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.212, even though the defendant was adjudicated incompetent approximately three weeks previously in an unrelated case. We affirm the order of the trial court without prejudice to the state’s filing a new motion to adjudicate defendant’s competency to stand trial at this time.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

474 So. 2d 16, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1992, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pringle-fladistctapp-1985.