State v. Prince

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Prince

407 S.W.3d 715, 2013 WL 4807084, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1039

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 10, 2013·No. No. WD 75525·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Prince III was charged in the Circuit Court of Boone County with child molestation, § 566.067, RSMo, and endangering the welfare of a child, § 568.045. Prince was convicted on both counts and sentenced to consecutive terms of fifteen years for child molestation and five years for child endangerment. Prince appeals, arguing that he is entitled to a new trial due to the erroneous denial of his motion for a bill of particulars, which requested more specific dates on which the crimes were alleged to have occurred. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been provided an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Prince III was charged in the Circuit Court of Boone County with child molestation, § 566.067, RSMo, and endangering the welfare of a child, § 568.045. Prince was convicted on both counts and sentenced to consecutive terms of fifteen years for child molestation and five years for child endangerment. Prince appeals, arguing that he is entitled to a new trial due to the erroneous denial of his motion for a bill of particulars, which requested more specific dates on which the crimes were alleged to have occurred. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been provided an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Prince, 407 S.W.3d 715, 2013 WL 4807084, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1039 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

407 S.W.3d 715 (State v. Prince) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.