State v. Price

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Price

190 S.E.2d 403, 15 N.C. App. 599, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1987

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedAugust 2, 1972

Docket7227SC449

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 190 S.E.2d 403 (State v. Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Price, 190 S.E.2d 403, 15 N.C. App. 599, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1987 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

*600 VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant contends that court erred in overruling his motion for dismissal upon his plea of former jeopardy. On 18 August 1971, while awaiting trial on the indictment for escape, defendant filed a petition in the District Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina seeking removal of the cause to that court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1448. a copy of the petition was filed with the Clerk of Gaston Superior Court.

On 7 October 1971, while the petition for removal was pending in the federal court, the State purported to try defendant and sentenced him to a term of two years.

No action was taken by the federal courts until 2 December 1971, at which time an order was entered remanding the cause and dismissing the petition for removal. The order also recited that “ . . . the petition having been timely and properly filed, the state court had no jurisdiction to proceed further and its trial and conviction of the petitioner for felonious escape is void.”

The present appeal arises from defendant’s trial and conviction on 3 February 1972. The first question presented is whether the trial of defendant while his petition for removal was pending constitutes former jeopardy. Judge Martin was correct in ruling that it did not.

The proper filing of the motion to remove the prosecution from the Superior Court of Gaston County to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina effected the removal and the state court was thereafter without jurisdiction to proceed until the cause was remanded by the federal court. State v. Francis, 261 N.C. 358, 134 S.E. 2d 681.

A former conviction by a court without jurisdiction will not support a plea of former jeopardy. State v. Cooke, Wolfe, Simkins, Sturdivent, Murray, Herring, 248 N.C. 485, 103 S.E. 2d 846.

In the trial from which the present appeal arises, the sentence imposed is greater than that imposed on 7 October 1971, while the petition for removal was pending. Defendant assigns this as error. The court was without jurisdiction in the earlier *601 trial and that judgment is a nullity. The imposition of a sentence of twenty-eight months in this, the first trial of defendant by a court having jurisdiction, was not error. The case of North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 23 L.Ed. 2d 656, 89 S.Ct. 2072, has no application. Defendant’s remaining assignments of error have been considered and found to be without merit.

No error.

Judges Parker and Graham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*600 VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant contends that court erred in overruling his motion for dismissal upon his plea of former jeopardy. On 18 August 1971, while awaiting trial on the indictment for escape, defendant filed a petition in the District Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina seeking removal of the cause to that court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1448. a copy of the petition was filed with the Clerk of Gaston Superior Court.

On 7 October 1971, while the petition for removal was pending in the federal court, the State purported to try defendant and sentenced him to a term of two years.

No action was taken by the federal courts until 2 December 1971, at which time an order was entered remanding the cause and dismissing the petition for removal. The order also recited that “ . . . the petition having been timely and properly filed, the state court had no jurisdiction to proceed further and its trial and conviction of the petitioner for felonious escape is void.”

The present appeal arises from defendant’s trial and conviction on 3 February 1972. The first question presented is whether the trial of defendant while his petition for removal was pending constitutes former jeopardy. Judge Martin was correct in ruling that it did not.

The proper filing of the motion to remove the prosecution from the Superior Court of Gaston County to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina effected the removal and the state court was thereafter without jurisdiction to proceed until the cause was remanded by the federal court. State v. Francis, 261 N.C. 358, 134 S.E. 2d 681.

A former conviction by a court without jurisdiction will not support a plea of former jeopardy. State v. Cooke, Wolfe, Simkins, Sturdivent, Murray, Herring, 248 N.C. 485, 103 S.E. 2d 846.

In the trial from which the present appeal arises, the sentence imposed is greater than that imposed on 7 October 1971, while the petition for removal was pending. Defendant assigns this as error. The court was without jurisdiction in the earlier *601 trial and that judgment is a nullity. The imposition of a sentence of twenty-eight months in this, the first trial of defendant by a court having jurisdiction, was not error. The case of North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 23 L.Ed. 2d 656, 89 S.Ct. 2072, has no application. Defendant’s remaining assignments of error have been considered and found to be without merit.

No error.

Judges Parker and Graham concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 S.E.2d 403, 15 N.C. App. 599, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-price-ncctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack