State v. Price

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Price

861 S.W.2d 201, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1485, 1993 WL 360835

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Price. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1559 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 1993·No. No. 63042·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals her conviction, in a court tried case, of failing to drive on the right side of the highway, § 304.015, RSMo 1986. She was fined fifteen dollars plus court costs. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals her conviction, in a court tried case, of failing to drive on the right side of the highway, § 304.015, RSMo 1986. She was fined fifteen dollars plus court costs. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Price, 861 S.W.2d 201, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1485, 1993 WL 360835 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

861 S.W.2d 201 (State v. Price) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.