State v. Preston

260 S.W.3d 927, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1168, 2008 WL 4058086
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 2, 2008·No. ED 90236·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Donald W. Preston, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Lincoln County following his conviction by a jury of one count of attempt to manufacture a controlled substance (methamphetamine), section 195.211 RSMo. (Supp.2007). The court sentenced the defendant as a prior drug offender to fifteen years’ imprisonment. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Preston, 260 S.W.3d 927, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1168, 2008 WL 4058086 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

260 S.W.3d 927 (State v. Preston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Preston v. State
325 S.W.3d 420 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)
American General Financial Services, Inc. v. Cedar Bridge, LLC.
260 S.W.3d 927 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)