State v. Preston

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Preston

704 A.2d 800, 243 Conn. 946, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 483

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 6, 1997·No. SC 15814·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 778 (AC 15834), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the evidence in this case, the third and fourth prongs of State v. Whistnant, 179 Conn. 576, 588 (1980), were satisfied, in that the trial court was required to give a charge on the lesser included offense of larceny in the sixth degree?”

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 778 (AC 15834), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the evidence in this case, the third and fourth prongs of State v. Whistnant, 179 Conn. 576, 588 (1980), were satisfied, in that the trial court was required to give a charge on the lesser included offense of larceny in the sixth degree?”

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

State v. Preston, 704 A.2d 800, 243 Conn. 946, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 483 (Colo. 1997).

Pincite

704 A.2d 800 (State v. Preston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related