State v. Preston

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Preston

704 A.2d 800, 243 Conn. 946, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 483

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedNovember 6, 1997

DocketSC 15814

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 704 A.2d 800 (State v. Preston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Preston, 704 A.2d 800, 243 Conn. 946, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 483 (Colo. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 778 (AC 15834), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the evidence in this case, the third and fourth prongs of State v. Whistnant, 179 Conn. 576, 588 (1980), were satisfied, in that the trial court was required to give a charge on the lesser included offense of larceny in the sixth degree?”

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 778 (AC 15834), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the evidence in this case, the third and fourth prongs of State v. Whistnant, 179 Conn. 576, 588 (1980), were satisfied, in that the trial court was required to give a charge on the lesser included offense of larceny in the sixth degree?”

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

704 A.2d 800, 243 Conn. 946, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-preston-conn-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack