State v. Preston Carter

Tennessee Supreme Court·Decided September 18, 2003·No. W2000-02204-SC-DDT-DD·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON

April 8, 2003 Session

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. PRESTON CARTER

Automatic Appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 93-09760 and 93-09761 Jon Kerry Blackwood, Judge

No. W2000-02204-SC-DDT-DD - Filed September 18, 2003

ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., J., dissenting.

I continue to adhere to the views expressed in a long line of dissents beginning with State v.

Chalmers, 28 S.W.3d 913, 923-25 (Tenn. 2000) (Birch, Jr., J., concurring and dissenting), and elaborated upon in State v. Godsey, 60 S.W.3d 759, 793-800 (Tenn. 2001) (Birch, Jr., J., concurring and dissenting), expressing my view that the comparative proportionality review protocol currently embraced by the majority is inadequate to insulate defendants from the arbitrary and disproportionate imposition of the death penalty. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-206(C) (1997). Accordingly, I cannot, for the reasons stated in my previous dissents, concur in the imposition of the death penalty in this case.

ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Preston Carter, (Tenn. 2003).

State v. Preston Carter (State v. Preston Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Godsey
60 S.W.3d 759 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2001)
State v. Chalmers
28 S.W.3d 913 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2000)