State v. Pratt
This text of 501 A.2d 431 (State v. Pratt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Stanley Pratt appeals his conviction of robbery, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 651(1)(A) (1983), in Superior Court, Androscoggin County. Pratt preserved his objection to the court’s rulings upon his request for a bill of particulars and his request for a jury instruction, both designed to limit the robbery charge to a specific incident in May of 1984. We determine that the court’s actions did adequately limit the jury’s consideration to the May 1984 incident. On Pratt’s third contention, we find no obvious error in the jury instructions concerning the elements of the offense of robbery.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
501 A.2d 431, 1985 Me. LEXIS 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pratt-me-1985.