State v. Pratt
This text of 484 A.2d 608 (State v. Pratt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Charles Pratt appeals from his conviction in Superior Court, Androscoggin County, of burglary, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401. Pursuant to M.R.Crim.P. 52(b), Pratt alleges the trial court committed obvious error in instructing the jury. We disagree. Reading the instructions in their entirety, we find no obvious error or defect affecting Pratt’s [609]*609substantial rights. State v. Smith, 472 A.2d 948, 950-51 (Me.1984).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
484 A.2d 608, 1984 Me. LEXIS 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pratt-me-1984.