State v. Pratt

484 A.2d 608, 1984 Me. LEXIS 837
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedNovember 27, 1984
StatusPublished

This text of 484 A.2d 608 (State v. Pratt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Pratt, 484 A.2d 608, 1984 Me. LEXIS 837 (Me. 1984).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Charles Pratt appeals from his conviction in Superior Court, Androscoggin County, of burglary, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401. Pursuant to M.R.Crim.P. 52(b), Pratt alleges the trial court committed obvious error in instructing the jury. We disagree. Reading the instructions in their entirety, we find no obvious error or defect affecting Pratt’s [609]*609substantial rights. State v. Smith, 472 A.2d 948, 950-51 (Me.1984).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Smith
472 A.2d 948 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
484 A.2d 608, 1984 Me. LEXIS 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pratt-me-1984.