State v. Pratt
484 A.2d 608, 1984 Me. LEXIS 837
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Charles Pratt appeals from his conviction in Superior Court, Androscoggin County, of burglary, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401. Pursuant to M.R.Crim.P. 52(b), Pratt alleges the trial court committed obvious error in instructing the jury. We disagree. Reading the instructions in their entirety, we find no obvious error or defect affecting Pratt’s [609] substantial rights. State v. Smith, 472 A.2d 948, 950-51 (Me.1984).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Pratt, 484 A.2d 608, 1984 Me. LEXIS 837 (Me. 1984).
484 A.2d 608 (State v. Pratt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Smith
472 A.2d 948 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1984)