State v. Pratt

671 So. 2d 328, 1996 La. LEXIS 1293, 1996 WL 164969
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Pratt. Read the opinion of the Court — 662 So. 2d 9
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 8, 1996·No. No. 96-KK-0503·Published

Opinion

In re Pratt, Lenora;—Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 93-F1201F; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 28626-KW.

Granted. The district court abused its discretion by revoking relator’s probation for her failure to make restitution. The ruling of the district court is vacated and this case is remanded to the court to fashion a reasonable plan of repayment (restitution) within relator’s ability to do so. See Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 103 S.Ct. 2064, 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983); State v. Foster, 93-1654 (La. 5/6/94), 637 So.2d 1039; State ex rel. Harrison v. Jeane, 617 So.2d 482 (La.1993).

LEMMON, KIMBALL and VICTORY, JJ., dissent and would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pratt, 671 So. 2d 328, 1996 La. LEXIS 1293, 1996 WL 164969 (La. 1996).

671 So. 2d 328 (State v. Pratt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bearden v. Georgia
461 U.S. 660 (Supreme Court, 1983)
State ex rel. Harrison v. Jeane
617 So. 2d 482 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1993)
State v. Foster
637 So. 2d 1039 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1994)