State v. Pratt

671 So. 2d 328, 1996 La. LEXIS 1293, 1996 WL 164969
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 8, 1996
DocketNo. 96-KK-0503
StatusPublished

This text of 671 So. 2d 328 (State v. Pratt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Pratt, 671 So. 2d 328, 1996 La. LEXIS 1293, 1996 WL 164969 (La. 1996).

Opinion

In re Pratt, Lenora;—Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 93-F1201F; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 28626-KW.

Granted. The district court abused its discretion by revoking relator’s probation for her failure to make restitution. The ruling of the district court is vacated and this case is remanded to the court to fashion a reasonable plan of repayment (restitution) within relator’s ability to do so. See Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 103 S.Ct. 2064, 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983); State v. Foster, 93-1654 (La. 5/6/94), 637 So.2d 1039; State ex rel. Harrison v. Jeane, 617 So.2d 482 (La.1993).

LEMMON, KIMBALL and VICTORY, JJ., dissent and would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bearden v. Georgia
461 U.S. 660 (Supreme Court, 1983)
State ex rel. Harrison v. Jeane
617 So. 2d 482 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1993)
State v. Foster
637 So. 2d 1039 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
671 So. 2d 328, 1996 La. LEXIS 1293, 1996 WL 164969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pratt-la-1996.