State v. Pratt
This text of 671 So. 2d 328 (State v. Pratt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Pratt, Lenora;—Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 93-F1201F; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 28626-KW.
Granted. The district court abused its discretion by revoking relator’s probation for her failure to make restitution. The ruling of the district court is vacated and this case is remanded to the court to fashion a reasonable plan of repayment (restitution) within relator’s ability to do so. See Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 103 S.Ct. 2064, 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983); State v. Foster, 93-1654 (La. 5/6/94), 637 So.2d 1039; State ex rel. Harrison v. Jeane, 617 So.2d 482 (La.1993).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 So. 2d 328, 1996 La. LEXIS 1293, 1996 WL 164969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pratt-la-1996.